Monday 28 April 2014

Bankruptcy of ‘Identity’ Politics


In a democratic republic an individual should be the unit for governance. His or her identification to a particular community should be of limited political relevance. However, India’s diverse social and unequal economic fabric has been prostituted to the advantage of political parties which claim to represent the cause or identity of one specific community as distinguishable from the other.

Irony of such representative politics is that it seeks to ameliorate the conditions of the very sect on whose social or economic backwardness it justifies its own existence. If the identifiable group is no longer deprived, the existence of a separate political outfit will be redundant. The political party who claims to work for the poor has every incentive to ensure that there should always be zillions of those. The need for continued political relevance compels them to work positively to ensure that anything that fuels the mobilization of the group is avoided at all cost.

Worthlessness of this brand of politics is empirically proven. It is this brand of politics that allows Bahujan Samaj Party in ensuring that the deprivation does not leave the marginalised scheduled tribes. It allows Rashtriya Janta Dal to be sole guardian the Muslim-Yadav community and the poorest of the poor and do nothing to benefit them.  It allowed the congress to permanently reverse the path towards uniform civil code by nullifying the landmark ruling of the Supreme Court and bending backwards repeatedly by sustaining regressive and archaic laws which would be despicable by any objective standard in a civilized society. So convenient and addictive was this trend that they had the audacity to subvert the constitution by introducing religious based reservation, prejudicing the interest the very muslim community which it claimed to represent.

Acceptability of this politics grants the party an immunity from any level of underperformance or corruption as ability to govern was never the basis for their claim for power. It is contagious as it almost forces other political rivals to adopt similar pattern. Consequently, what the country witnessed the creation and widening of social divide, invention of competitive and often conflicting identities and precedence of symbolism over substance. Meanwhile, the national interest is relegated leaving the identity of an individual as Indian largely irrelevant.


The last thing that a community would need to secure its identity is self-proclaimed political guardians.